Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access
Total views : 1172

The role of Unsolicited Proposals in developing Public Infrastructure: An Empirical Study


DOI: 10.33516/rb.v44i2.106-119p

Abstract


Infrastructure development is one of the major indicators of growth of a nation. While governments across developing countries have explored various options for efficient and speedy development of their country's infrastructure, there exist many gaps which need further attention. To overcome these gaps, most of the countries are increasingly looking forward for the private sector participation for development of public infrastructure and services. Involving private sector through Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) offers a promising alternative to conventional public procurement methods for financing mega infrastructure projects.

In any Conventional method of project development, the conceptualization, designing and planning of an infrastructure project is undertaken by the government. However, a private sector entity may also take the initiative for designing projects for development of social infrastructure in-line with the government’s suo moto thought process. The proposals put forth by private sector other than the conventional route undergoing Request for Proposal (RFP), and Request for Quotation (RFQ) for development of public infrastructure are commonly known as unsolicited proposals (USPs).

This paper discusses the positive and negative side of USPs and investigates the roles and requirement of USPs in developing public infrastructure for addressing the fast growing infrastructural gaps, mostly in developing countries. This paper also highlights various methods of procurement of USPs and discusses its impact on various stakeholders. It mainly focuses on specific countries like Chile, Philippines and India where USPs are regarded as a tool for infrastructure development in many areas.


Keywords

Unsolicited Proposals, Public Infrastructure, Infrastructural Gaps, Public Private Partnerships (PPP)

Full Text:

Purchase Issue (PDF views: 2)

References


  • Agarwal, A. K. (2014),“Swiss Challenge Procurment”,Ernst & Young LLP,New Delhi.
  • Camacho, F. T., Rodrigues, B. C., & Vieira, H. M. (2017),“Unsolicited Proposals in Infrastructure – Lessons from Brazil and Chile”,The Emerald Handbook of Public– Private Partnerships in Developing and Emerging.
  • GoAP (2011),The Andhra Pradesh Infrastructure Development Enabling Act. Government of Andhra Prahesh.
  • Government of Gujarat (2006),The Gujarat Infrastructure Development (Amendment) Act. The Gujarat Government Gazette.
  • Hodges, J. T., & Dellacha, G. (2007),“Unsolicited Infrastructure Proposals How Some Countries Introduce Competition and Transparency”,PPIAF, Washington.
  • IBRD & IDA (2017),“Guidelines for the Development of a Policy for Managing Unsolicited Proposals in Infrastructure Projects”, The World Bank.
  • IGM Rebel Advisory LLC (2014),“Unsolicited Proposals – An Exception to Public Initiation of Infrastructure PPPs: An Analysis of Global Policies and Lessons Learned”, PPIAF World Bank.
  • Jhingan, S., Gandhi, K., & Lal, S. (2016),“India: Swiss Challenge MethodUnsolicited Proposals For Development”, available at: ttp://www.mondaq.com/india/x/49049 6/Government+Contracts+Procurement+PPP /Swiss+Challenge+Method+Unsolicited+Prop osals+For+Development (Accessed 02 Janurary 2018).
  • The Practical Lawyer (2016),“Competitive Award of Unsolicited Infrastructure Proposals: A recent Supreme Court verdict unveils fresh opportunities for procurement reform in India”, The Practical Lawyer.
  • World Bank Group (2017), “Review of Experiences with Unsolicited Proposals in Infrastructure Projects”, The World Bank.



DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33516/rb.v44i2.106-119p